Management of complex wounds treatment with a hydrofiber dressing in a public hospital in Bogota (Colombia)

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of the use of a last generation hydrofiber dressing with silver, for the treatment of complex wounds that are difficult to heal.

Materials and research methods. A prospective observational case-follow-up study was carried out, which included patients with acute or chronic wounds that were difficult to heal, treated in the plastic surgery service of a public hospital in Bogota-Colombia, who underwent healing with hydrofiber dressings reinforced, with silver ions, benzethonium chloride and EDTA (Aquacel Agplus®, ConvaTec). The wound was monitored, evaluating infection control, exudate and biofilm, as well as the number of required dressings and the time required for the complete closure of the wound.

Research results. A total of 55 patients were included, with a median age of 44 years. In all cases, a follow-up was carried out until the definitive closure of the wound. At the end of the study, it was observed that, in 35 (63.6 %) patients, the wounds evolved to complete closure by second intention in an average of 59.3 days, requiring 12.5 dressings. 20 (36.4 %) patients had adequate wound bed preparation for definitive surgical coverage with grafts, flaps or dermal substitutes, in an average of 31.4 days, requiring 6.5 dressings on average.

33 (60.0 %) wounds were infected and adequate infection control was achieved on average with 5 dressings. A decrease in the direct and indirect signs of biofilm was achieved after 6 dressings.

Conclusion. The results show that the dressing studied is effective to control exudate, infection and biofilm, as well as to prepare the bed for a definitive surgical coverage.

1. Atiyeh B. S., Ioannovich J., Al-Amm C. A., EI-Musa K. A. Management of acute and chronic open wounds: the importance of moist environment in optimal wound healing. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2002; 3 (3): 179-195.

2. Troxler M., Vowden K., Vowden P. Integrating adjunctive therapy into practice: The importance of recognosing “hard to heal” wounds. World Wide Wounds. 2005.

3. Margolls D. J., Allen-Taylor L., Hoffstad O., Berlin J. A. The Accuracy of venous leg ulcer prognostic models in a wound care system. Wound repair regen. 2004; 12 (2):163-68.

4. Phillips T. J., Machedo F., Trout R., et al. Prognostic indicators in venous ulcers. Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 43 (4): 627630.

5. Schultz G. S., Sibbald R. G., Falanga V., et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003; 11 (Suppl 1): S1.

6. Gompelman M., van Asten S. A. V., Peters E. J. G. Update on the Role of Infection and Biofilms in Wound Healing: Pathophysiology and Treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138 (3S): 61S-70S.

7. Metcalf D. G., Bowler P. G., Hurlow J. A clinical algorithm for wound biofilm identification. J Wound Care. 2014; 23 (3):137—142.

8. Patel R. Biofilms and Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2005; (437): 41—47.

9. Hurlow J., Bowler P. G. Clinical experience with wound biofilm and management: a case series. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009; 55 (4): 38—49.

10. Hurlow J., Bowler P. G. Potential implications of biofilm in chronic wounds: a case series. J Wound Care. 2012; 21(3): 109—119.

11. Wolcott R. D., Rumbaugh K. P., James G., et al. Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window. J Wound Care 2010; 19(8):320—328.

12. Metcalf D., Parsons D., Woo K. Next-generation antimicrobial dressings: AQUACELTM Ag+ ExtraTM and Ribbon. Wounds International. 2014; 5: Sup-pl.

13. Bowler P. G., Welsby S., Towers V., et al. Multidrug-resistant organisms, wounds and topical antimicrobial protection. Int Wound J. 2012; 9 (4): 387—396.

14. Bowler P. G., Jones S. A., Walker M., et al. Microbicidal properties of a silver-containing hydrofiber dressing against a variety of burn wound pathogens. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004; 25 (2): 192—196.

15. Jones S. A., Bowler P. G., Walker M., Parsons D. Controlling wound bioburden with a novel silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing. Wound Repair Regen. 2004; 12(3): 288—294.

16. The broad spectrum activity of FAB Ag using a corrected zone of inhibition assay. Scientific Background Report, WHRI3609 MA194. 2012. Data on file, ConvaTec.

17. Assessment of the physical disruption of biofilm by the application of FAB Ag. Scientific Background Report, WHRI3682 TA256. 2012. Data on file, ConvaTec.

18. The antimicrobial activity of FAB Ag against surface-attached bacteria. Scientific Background Report, WHRI3636 MA206. 2012. Data on file, ConvaTec.

19. Prevention of bacterial attachment by FAB Ag (EASH, DHF#707). Scientific Background Report, WHRI3635 MA205. 2012. Data on file, ConvaTec.

20. Seth A. K., Zhong A., Nguyen K. T., et al. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model. Wound Repair Regen. 2014; 22 (6): 712— 719.

21. Visualization of the speed of kill by FAB Ag using a confocal microscope. Scientific Background Report, WHRI3617 MA199. 2012. Data on file, ConvaTec.

22. Parsons D. Composition comprising antimicrobial metal ions and a quaternary cationic surfactant. 2012. https://tinyurl.com/twz5yfz

23. Ceri H., Olson M. E., Stremick C., et al. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37 (6): 1771—1776.

24. Gurjala A. N., Geringer M. R., Seth A. K., et al. Development of a novel, highly quantitative in vivo model for the study of biofilm-impaired cutaneous wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2011; 19 (3): 400—410.

25. Metcalf D. G., Parsons D., Bowler P. G. Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm. Int Wound J. 2017; 14 (1): 203—213.

26. Murphy C., Atkin L., Swanson T., et al. International consensus document. Defying hard-to-heal wounds with an early antibioflm intervention strategy: wound hygiene. J Wound Care. 2020; 29 (Suppl 3b): S1—S28.